Onebornfree's Special Scam Alerts No.188 - Sept. 10th.2022

The September 11th. 2001 "Terrorist Attacks" Scam- 21st. Anniversary:

[UPDATE:091222: Oops, seems I  messed 

up ! :-( .  After some recent email exchanges with Simon I have been corrected regarding my assumptions as to the online availability of his entire "September Clues" series; all of them can in fact be seen at 2 locations now, one being at his main site, here , and the other is at: "September Clues Tour Guide"- {just scroll down that page to find them all}. 

Below you will find some other places to see some of that research that were current as of the date of this post.

 *********************************

Obf sez: Way back in Sept. 2019 I wrote a blog entry dedicated to the alleged "terrorist attacks on America" carried out on September 11th, 2001, and in particular, the 9/11 research of one individual, Mr Simon Shack. 

If you take a look at that entry today, you will see that only one of the Simon Shack authored videos I'd posted to it way back then are still current, all the rest having been removed from the host site, Youtube. 

Indeed, one reason I'd made that 2019 post in the first place was because the creator of those videos, Simon Shack, had had all of his 9/11"September Clues" research series, repeatedly removed from both his channel there, and from channels  authored by others who supported his research conclusions.

Unfortunately, and due to "circumstances beyond my control" 😞, I''ve  until now been unable to update  that original 2019 entry with new links to his videos, as I should have done in both 2020 and 2021. 

Anyhoo, I'd first discovered Simon's 9/11 research by accident, back in 2007. By late 2008, after a whole lot of back and forth arguments, both with myself and with others, and after many months of twice daily [on average] visits to forums at his website ,[I'm a slow learner :-) ], I was firmly convinced that Simon's assertions about the mainstream media's [MSM] visual records of those alleged events were correct, and  that indeed :

all of the original US MSM imagery that was "live" broadcast by the 5 US MSM stations [ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, NBC] was in fact 100% fake imagery fabricated in a studio on computers [ "computer generated imagery",or "C.G.I."], prior to 9/11, then broadcast as genuine "live"imagery on the morning of 9/11, including all imagery showing Fl.175 striking WTC2, and all imagery showing the destructions of WTCs 1, 2, and 7, and all "post crash" "live"imagery of the Pentagon scene. 

3000 Fake Victims?:

Not only that, Simon and associates further research had discovered that most, and very possibly all, of the alleged 3,000 victims appear to  have been fake persons that never even existed in the real world, complete with fake, heavily "photo-shopped"  portraits at the memorial websites, fake family members, and fake bios. 

See: "VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11  

In my original 2019 blog entry I had written:

 "March 4th 2018- Simon Shacks YouTube Channel Deleted!"

"By now, some of you might have seen the last [2008] version of Simon's main video about 9/11 , "September Clues". "

"For years Simon had maintained his own YouTube channel to present "September Clues"and his other associated research to a wider audience."

" However on March 4th 2018, his entire channel was deleted with no notice, no explanation, and with no outstanding violations. This took place a full 5 months  BEFORE the great YouTube purge is generally considered to have started [ August 2018] with the removal of the so-called "big name" channels of Alex Jones [ "InfoWars"+"Prison Planet"] from YouTube. "

 

Since YouTube purged Simon Shacks channel in 2018, it has become much harder to find any of his other 9/11 "September Clues" related videos as well - all of which are well worth tracking down and closely watching. 

 So now, after some more recent research [Sept. 2022],  I've  managed to  re-track down  a few of Simons other, lesser known [but equally important] "September Clues" series videos, which is what this  post is mostly about. 

So here, in no particular order,  are the new  [Sept. 2022] links available to much of Simon's 9/11 research. 

If you, dear reader, know of other sites which have these same, or other posted examples of Simon's research that I have somehow missed in my brief search, please let me know.

[email: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom],

Enjoy!    Regards, obf

N.B. And a special thanks to AbIrato, the "fakeologist"for keeping many/most of these videos on line for viewing, to this day.

Podcast: Onebornfree's Last Covid-19 Radio Interview- 

On The Fabulous Fakeologist Radio Show [Show no. FAK 224]Saturday April 4th. 2020

[Warning- some bad language!]

************************

SEPTEMBER CLUES: PART A

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KXyu6XuKngQe/

*****************************

SEPTEMBER CLUES: PART B”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WE82WftpLI0d/

****************************

"September Clues Addendum":

https://www.bitchute.com/video/sN8FXmfCaqGQ/

***************************

"September Clues Epilogue":

https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/september-clues-epilogue-new1-mp4/

and also at: 

https://www.mojvideo.com/video-september-clues-epilogue-new/3653c5b7b1e245760055

***************************

"September Clues 911 PROPAGANDA":

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LV8gwJM7RMNW/

*************************

September Clues: "Synched Out":

This video analysis of the 5 US MSM TV stations coverage from the beginning to the point up to where Fl.175 struck WTC2, shows that when when synched time-wise, an approximately 3 second difference in the time the plane allegedly hit is revealed, and also that much of the US MSM "live" coverage is inexplicably simultaneously duplicated on as many as 4 networks: 

https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/synched-out-avi/

**************************

September Clues "Nosed Out":

This analysis of the famous "live" Fox5 footage of Fl.175's "argument" with WTC2 reveals the fraudulence of the entire sequence:

https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/september-clues-nosed-out-mp4/

And while you're on the subject, see also my own blog entry revealing the vast discrepancies in the alleged speed of Fl.175, depending on which video is used for analysis: 

"175's Speed: Fairbanks [290+ mph] or Fox [540 + mph]?: 

See also"The 9/11 "Truth Movement" Versus Simple, Common Sense Logic "

**************************

"September Clues FOXED OUT :

More thoughts from Simon on Fox5's glaring "in yer face", "nose out" fakery error and [later] attempted cover-up of that error in their on-line official archives: 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3eQz5cZBXnOl/

***************************

SEPTEMBER CLUES & 9/11 "AMATEUR" FOOTAGE

This analysis demonstrates that all of the alleged intrepid, "on the spot, right place right time amateur" video footage of Fl.175 hitting WTC2 is fake footage manufactured on computers:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IA4OEbyTF9uW/

******************************

"September Clues WTC7 Study": 

This study shows the complete and utter fraudulence of all of the various existing videos depicting the collapse of WTC7, all of which are, to this day, just like any other 9/11 "live" video sequences or photos religiously studied as being undeniable proof of whatever any particular 9/11"researcher" wants to prove [eg nuclear demolition, direct energy weapons, holographic plane images etc. etc. etc.] :

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lLijq51a5Sxw/

*************************

"September Clues - Chopped Out":

Starring, strange backward moving helicopters, "live"on TV! [so it must be real!]:

[This one, uploaded by  my old friend AbIrato, is  _still_ on Youtube , if you can believe that! :-) ]:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPSwPATrJBE

+ https://fakeotube.com/video/35/september-clues---chopped-ou

*********************************

"September Clues SOME BIRDS":

Starring a flock of birds, [as opposed to helicopters :-) ] performing amazing cross-screen feats of instantaneous, doubling of speed,  acceleration ! "Live!"[Cripes!, it doesn't get any better than this, does it? ]:

https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/september-clues-some-birds-mp4/

*************************

"September Clues The Grand TV Illusion":

More "live" 9/11 TV fakery exposed:

https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/september-clues-the-grand-tv-illusion-mp4/ 

******************************************

Some of My Music:

https://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2022/08/links-to-some-of-my-songs.html

"Onebornfree" is  a:

Songwriter/musician

 Investment Philosophy Consultant, 

a Personal Freedom Consultant, 

and a Natural Health/Fitness Consultant 

******************************************

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email: onebornfree at yahoo dot com

***************

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email:  onebornfree at yahoo dot com

************************************

Onebornfree's Special Scam Alerts No.138- April 13th.2020

obf disclaimer: links to any authors articles or videos are not necessarily full endorsements of all of the views/positions of any of the individuals or organizations concerned!

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email: onebornfree at yahoo dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Food For [Serious]Thought: 

“If, as it seems we are, in the process of becoming a totalitarian society in which the state apparatus is all-powerful, the ethics most important for the survival of the true, free, human individual would be: cheat, lie, evade, fake it, be elsewhere, forge documents, build improved electronic gadgets in your garage that’ll outwit the gadgets used by the authorities.” Philip K. Dick.

Some of My Favorite Quotes [Misc.]

Some Important Plandemic Advice: Protecting Individuals From The CV-19 Pandemic Scam
[ James Corbett video]

------------------------------------------
Ad: Global Pandemic Coming? Bank Failures Coming?, Stock Market Crash Coming?, Deflation Coming?,Inflation Coming? What's Next? Are you worried about your savings/investments? See: How To Safely Profit In Stocks,Gold,Crypto's etc., Despite The Unknowable Economic Future

----------------------------------------
Free!:Obf's Own Plandemic Advice
[Podcast: Onebornfree's Radio Interview On The Fabulous Fakeologist Radio Show Saturday April 4th. 2020

More Plandemic Advice: Protecting Yourself From The CV-19 Lockdown Scam
"Accept The Reality That Political Leaders Are Not Going to Save You - They Are Only Going To Make Things Worse"
------------------------------------
Ad: More Freedom 4U?:The Problem Solver- Personal Freedom Consulting
-------------------------------------
The 9/11 Scam-The Faked "Live" MSM Imagery
Revealed! The computer-manufactured fraudulence all of the mainstream media’s original“live” footage broadcast on the morning of Sept.11th 2001.
***************************
My Music:My composition “Dreams [Matrix Blues]”performed solo,live at open mike.[YouTube]

In case you missed the blatant advertising above,  "Onebornfree" is also an Investment Philosophy Consultant, and, a Personal Freedom and Natural Health Consultant

obf disclaimer: links to any authors articles or videos are not necessarily full endorsements of all of the views/positions of any of the individuals or organizations concerned!

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email: onebornfree at yahoo dot com

************************************

You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs "Dictator Syndrome"

     

 

                         

[Who is "?" above?Insert  any image you choose- Obama, Bush 1 or 2, Clinton, Reagan,Kennedy, Washington, Jefferson, Adams or your own, perhaps ?]


[Obf sez: as a personal freedom consultant and problem solver , one of the biggest and most dangerous belief hurdles/barriers that I frequently come across when talking with both clients, and others, and one that I believe that any truly freedom-seeking individual has to eventually see through, {or somehow jump over}, is the individuals almost unshakeable belief/assumptions for the necessity of, and the integrity of , the institution known as government.

In truth, their greatest enemy is, in fact, the government under which they live , as is/are the multitudes of paid for intellectual mouthpieces/sycophants who serve as its constant cheerleader within the almost entirely goverment-controlled and licensed media outlets of every type, everywhere.

Which brings me to the hilarious spectacle of the current 2016 US presidential election cycle.

A major psychological reason as to why individuals actually believe in any of the current crop of US presidential wannabe's, and indeed, the entire political process, year after year, after year, is something that the great Harry Browne has called "The Dictator Syndrome" , which basically boils down to a series of false assumptions about the way governments actually work in the real world.

The sad fact is that each and every one of the candidates for the US presidency suffer from this syndrome, as do all of their millions and millions of supporters/believers/sycophants.

I'll let Harry explain it, below.

N.B. If you do not understand or believe his short, clear summary of how the real-world political process actually works as laid out below, perhaps we need to talk, for, make no mistake, this is a very important issue- you can never hope to be truly free until you remove this particularly delusional and self-damaging belief from your personal belief system. I can be reached at : onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

Regards, onebornfree]

Harry Browne: "If You Were King (The Dictator Syndrome)"

"Government grows also because well-meaning people like you and me believe it should do certain things that seem beyond controversy -- find a cure for cancer, stop air pollution, keep violence off television, hold back an aggressor in the Middle East -- something that everyone seems to agree should be done. Whatever the goal, it's easy to imagine that a single-minded government could achieve it.

I call this The Dictator Syndrome. You see suffering or danger, and in your imagination you see a government program eliminating it. But in the real world the program would operate as you expect only if you were an absolute dictator -- having at your disposal all of government's power to compel everyone to do things your way."

Running the Gauntlet of Political Action

"Just for a moment, think about something you wish the government would do and that nearly everyone would like to see happen -- provide swifter and surer punishment for criminals, teach children right and wrong, furnish health care to those who don't have it, bring peace to Bosnia, or whatever. Imagine a goal so important that it seems to justify using government's power to coerce.

And now, consider what will actually happen to your program.

To get it enacted you'll need political allies, since alone you have only limited influence. But other people will support your plan and work for it only if you modify it in dozens of ways that further their goals and satisfy their opinions.

Suppose you make the necessary compromises and amass enough support to pressure the politicians to vote for your revised program. Who will write the actual law? You? Of course not. It will be written by the same legislators and aides who created all the laws, programs, and problems you object to now. Each of them will compromise your program still further to satisfy his political supporters.

And if the law passes, who will administer it? You? Of course not. It will be implemented by bureaucrats -- many of whom will use it to pursue goals quite different from what you had in mind. They won't care what your purpose was. It's their law now, and they'll use it to suit their objectives.

And, lastly, the new law probably will generate many disputes -- cases that must be settled in a courtroom. Who will decide those cases? You? Of course not. It will be the same judges who today rule according to their own beliefs, rather than by reference to the written law. A judge may even rule that your law means exactly the opposite of what you had intended.
By the time your program has run this gauntlet, it will be far bigger and far more expensive (in money and disrupted lives) than you had imagined. And it will have been twisted to satisfy many factions. In fact, your program may end up being the opposite of what you had intended.

In any case, you will have provided a new tool by which others can use government for their own ends."

Excerpted form: Browne, Harry, Why Government Doesn't Work, Chapter 5, "If You Were King (The Dictator Syndrome), St, Martin's Press, New York, NY, 1995, pp 20-21


Regards, onebornfree.

Related articles :

 "The Fiscal Fantasies of Stephen Zarlenga and Other Monetary Reformers"

Music: "Dreams [Anarchist Blues] :

The Rise Of The Anti Establishment Trump -Larken Rose

From Conservative To Anarchist

[Comment from Onebornfree and The Freedom Network: if you like this article, please take a look at the related article by the late Joe Sobran linked to at the bottom of the page.]

Four years ago, I became an anarchist, and I’ve never looked back. My political philosophy now runs through my veins. But this wasn’t always the case. I used to be a young, apathetic conservative. Then, I was introduced to libertarianism, which slowly turned me into an anarchist. This might sound crazy, but I assure you, it’s quite reasonable, and many people share my same story.

It all started in 2007. I was casually aware of politics at the time. My parents were conservative, so I was conservative. Youtube was still relatively new, and I remember one day stumbling across a video of Ron Paul. I was immediately intrigued. Here was this funny old man saying the opposite of his fellow Republicans on stage, and he called himself a “Constitutional conservative”. This sounded appealing. He would say all these fascinating things I’d never heard before, and the more videos I watched, the more excited I became. After only a few weeks, I was fully on-board with the platform of this Ron Paul guy. Little did I know this resonance with a political philosophy would change my life.

If you know anything about Ron Paul, you know he’s an exception to the rule. He was a politician, yes, but only in title. Politicians are (rightly) known as slimy, spineless, unprincipled folk whose political ambition overrules any shred of integrity they possess. Ron is the opposite. He defies the oxymoron “principled politician”. He’s been called the one exception to the gang of 535. And it shows when he talks. He doesn’t appeal to rhetorical flourishes or woo the crowd with empty platitudes. He really believes what he says and speaks out of conviction, something nonexistent among politicians.

But to me, ultimately, Ron Paul is a charming, principled nerd. He’s an extremely well-educated man in every area of political thought, especially Economics. He puts philosophic ideas above politics or elections. In fact, he used his presidential campaigns as educational platforms. Ron didn’t think he could win, but he knew more people would discover the power of free-market ideas if he ran for president.

But as he would tell you, Ron Paul’s ideas are more important than his person. Millions of people were swayed by the philosophy of freedom, not just his charming personality. The core principles of limited government resonated through all political upbringings, whether you identified as a liberal, conservative, or were apathetic.

Given my conservative ideology, I knew that lots of people gave lip service to the Constitution, but rarely did they defend it consistently. They supported military intervention overseas, but balked at the idea of requiring Congress to formally declare war. They complained about the Department of Education, but would only support gentle budget cuts, at most. Ron said what conservatives were too afraid to say: get the government out of education altogether. We don’t need a 10% budget reduction; we need to abolish the whole department! Conservatives say they support individual responsibility and don’t want a nanny-state. Then how can they support the War on Drugs? If an adult decides to peacefully smoke pot in his basement, and not hurt anybody, we don’t need a nanny-state micro-manage his life and throw him in jail. Conservatives supposedly want you to be free to make bad decisions, as long as you pay the consequences for them.

Probably the most controversial position Ron held was on the US military. He thought, as old-school conservatives did, that we should be extremely cautious before intervening in foreign affairs. He also thought the Pentagon wasn’t infallible; they are prone to the same egregious waste and mismanagement as the Department of Education. This ruffled a lot of feathers. It shouldn’t have. Ron simply applied the same principles across the whole spectrum of government.

He was consistent, and he kept coming back to the following principle: what is the proper role of government? Before we argue about cutting 10% of the Department of Education’s budget, shouldn’t we discuss whether or not it should exist in the first place? Is it appropriate, or even Constitutional, for the Executive Branch to send troops into foreign counties for an extended amount of time without Congressional declaration? Before we nibble around the edges of government spending, we need to talk about what government should do in the first place.

To me, he was precisely correct, but it revealed an unsavory truth: Republicans and Democrats aren’t so different from each other. One party might want to raise spending 5%; the other might want to cut spending 5%, but both favor the status quo and support big government in their respective areas. Liberals and conservatives are like two sides of the same coin. Constitutional conservatism, I thought, represented a real alternative.

But my journey didn’t stop there, because Ron implanted a little seed in my head. When he spoke, he often mentioned the “Austrian School of Economics”. I never heard of it, but eventually, I decided to Google around. What I discovered changed my life. I came across the Mises Institute, which had a number of free books and lectures online about Austrian Economics. I was immediately enamored. The explanatory power of Economics was breathtaking. After diving into the literature, I didn’t simply believe government was inefficient, I understood why. This had an enormous impact on my political philosophy, and it started my transition to radical libertarianism.

I now believe it’s impossible to have a clear understanding about how the world works without Economics. The coordination of prices, profits, and losses in a market is awe-inspiring. No exaggeration – it is almost miraculous. I will write extensively about this at a later time. But suffice to say, Economics became a pillar around which I would develop my other political beliefs.

The further I learned – the further I went down the rabbit hole of Austrian Economics – the more “radical” I became. Not only was government inefficient at delivering mail, but they were inefficient everywhere they intervened. The same economic principles apply to the Post Office as apply to the Patent Office. Of course, this wasn’t radicalism for the sake of radicalism, it was just consistency. And if you apply economic principles consistently across the board, you are left with a very grim perspective of government. However, I was no anarchist.

I firmly believed in small-government libertarianism. Markets could handle everything except few core services: the courts, military, and police. Of course, this would be considered wildly limited government compared to today’s standards.

My first interaction with an anarchist, ironically enough, was as an intern in Ron Paul’s congressional office. I was given the opportunity to be his intern in DC for a semester, and one of his staffers considered himself an anarchist. He was a nice guy, but I didn’t take his ideas too seriously.

But that changed in the summer of 2010. I was fortunate enough to attend a conference for students at the Mises Institute – the organization I held in such high regard. The conference was called “Mises University”, and it would be a week long, focusing solely on Austrian Economics. I was elated, and it turned out to be one of the most intellectually stimulating weeks of my life. I was surrounded with the smartest peers I’ve ever met.

A few lectures hinted at the possibility of complete statelessness – the idea that private entrepreneurs could better provide all the services of government, including courts, military, and police. Supposedly, for the same reasons we don’t want government to monopolize the production of shoes, we don’t want them to monopolize the court system or the production of national defense. I wasn’t convinced.

During the middle of the week, I was forced to adjust my beliefs a little bit, so I called myself a “Secessionist” for a few days. But I was no anarchist. I agreed with some core ideas – that taxation is fundamentally coercive and is therefore theft. I agreed that markets were based on voluntary, peaceful human interaction, while governments were necessarily based on violence or threats of violence; and I agreed that, in a perfect world, we wouldn’t need any coercion whatsoever – voluntary decisions would reign supreme. But, I thought, we don’t live in a perfect world, and surely in some circumstances, large groups of people wouldn’t care about the “rights” of an individual. Statelessness might sound nice in theory, but in practice, people wouldn’t respect the property rights of a lone anarchist, declaring his independence in the middle of a city.

Until one night, when I was challenged by a fellow student named Dan. He was a pretty burly guy, former Air Force I think, and we were hanging out at one of the local bars after the lectures. (Of course, “hanging out at the bar” at Mises University really meant “talking loudly about nerdy ideas in public places”. I remember some locals dancing at the bar, but they were outnumbered 3-1 by sweaty geeks talking about monetary history.)

I told Dan about my hesitations with anarchism, and he said he understood. “But,” he said, “let me ask you this: if I want to opt out of government services, should I be able to?” It’s a simple question, but I didn’t know how to respond. I wanted to say, “Of course you should be able to opt out of government services! If you don’t want to pay, you don’t have to, but then you don’t get to use the services.” But alas, such an admission would be tantamount to anarchism. After all, government services are by definition tied to taxation, and you can’t opt out of taxation. Doing so would be opting out of government, which is precisely what these anarchists were talking about.

On the other hand, I couldn’t say with a straight face that indeed, Dan should never be able to opt out of government services. I’d have to be willing to put him in jail if he tried. Even if his decision to opt out was poor – if he’d be better off by using the services – I couldn’t justify forcing him to pay for something he didn’t want. So, I was perplexed. I didn’t have a good response, and I remember slowly responding, “I think I might be an anarchist now.”

I wrestled with that question for the next few months, as I kept trying to justify the existence of involuntary government. I read a book called Chaos Theory by Bob Murphy, which has a section on the private production of law. My list of necessary government services dwindled. Then it happened: I became a closet anarchist. After playing devil’s advocate so much with myself – being an annoying anarchist – I couldn’t find a proper counter-argument to my critiques of limited government.

I was shocked. I couldn’t believe I’d ended up so far away from where I started. I thought anarchists were bomb-throwing hooligans who smashed in windows for recreation. But this type of anarchism was about private property and peaceful, voluntary cooperation. I saw the contradictions and inconsistencies in popular conservatism, and I couldn’t stomach it any longer.

By the end of 2010, I came out of the closet. But I didn’t know what to call myself. “Anarchist” seemed too dramatic and hot-button. (Believe it or not, people dismiss you rather quickly upon identifying as an anarchist.) I toyed around with labels like “anti-statist” or other nonsense, but I’ve recently settled on the term I find most appropriate: market anarchism.

You can sum up market anarchism succinctly: all the services which are currently provided by governments can be more efficiently and ethically provided by private entrepreneurs. Granted, there’s a million different ways to phrase it, but that’s how I prefer. Really not so radical, is it?

Four years later, and my conviction has become stronger. The explanatory power of market anarchism is unparalleled. Politics finally makes sense when you throw out the romance surrounding government and patriotism. But what’s surprising to me is how my own justification for anarchism has changed. I still wholly subscribe to Austrian Economic theory, but now I am even more compelled by the ethical and philosophic arguments for anarchism. To an anarchist, it’s clear as day: taxation is theft. Theft is immoral. Therefore, taxation is immoral, which condemns government as immoral. Simple and profound.

Upon taking the leap to anarchism, it appears preposterous and naive to try and manage the lives of a hundred million people from a central planning board. Social problems involving 300 million people aren’t resolvable by one tiny group forcing everybody to act a certain way, threatening them with jail time if they don’t comply. It seems clear.

On a philosophic level, proponents for government run into trouble: what exactly is a government, anyway? Upon inspection, “governments” are only grandiose, harmful abstractions; they have no tangible reality. We live in a world inhabited by humans – not “governments” or “countries”. This might sound absurd – and I won’t defend the claims right now – but I intend to give rigorous explanations for these ideas in the future.

The anarchist worldview is radically individualist, not because it views people as isolated decision-makers, but because individualism is the most philosophically critical way of viewing the world. It helps us avoid dramatic abstractions and opens up the world of economic thinking. And at this point, I can’t imagine turning back; anarchism has gone to my core.

If anybody is intrigued by this story, I only ask they pursue the topic sincerely. Hold on to your objections as long as you can, and see if your beliefs can withstand the criticism of market anarchist arguments. I humbly suggest starting with Austrian Economics and see where it leads. I, for one, sought political truths as a young conservative, and I believe I’ve found them in market anarchism.

Reprinted with permission from Steve Patterson.

Related article:"The Reluctant Anarchist"- Joe Sobran

The Secret Appeal Of Politics-Paul Rosenberg

[ Onebornfree/Freedom Network commentary: One of the most important aspects affecting the possible achievement of more freedom for the individual is: the overcoming of the propaganda/brainwashing that they have continually been subjected to on a daily basis, since they were born, that has persuaded them that governments are both necessary and socially beneficial organizations that have everyone's best interests at  heart. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. This article by Paul Rosenberg goes a long way towards exposing the myths of politics, and political organizations everywhere- enjoy, obf. ]

"The Internet is full of stories about politicians acting badly and doing the opposite of what they promised. Talk radio is full of the same things, all day, every day. Even around office water coolers, almost everyone will admit that politicians are liars and thieves.

Given all of this, it's rather bizarre that people still believe and obey the bums. If we knew such things about a neighbor, would we continue to take them seriously?

Yet, for some reason, politicians get a permanent pass on anything stupid they do.

The first reason for this is simply that most people have been bamboozled. They were taught that government is necessary and that without it, we'd all be ignorant savages, eating whatever few berries and roots we could scrounge... that without government nothing would be built, nothing invented, and nothing taught.

That's all propaganda, of course, paid for by the people it praises. But, it's what we were all taught and it's hard for people to let it go, no matter how stupid it is.

The second reason is that people are afraid. We all know why.

None of that, however, is what I want to cover today. Instead, I want to look at the subtle reasons why people can't let go of "politics." These reasons are very powerful, but they lie beneath the surface and are harder to identify than self-serving, government-funded BS.

Reason #1: I Can Blame Anyone but Me

Somehow, people all across the West have become pathologically afraid of blame. It probably began as a corrosive fear of hell: If I'm to blame for anything, I'll go to hell, and that must be avoided.

But be that as it may, this fear of blame allows political parties to provide a highly desirable service: They help you assign all blame to others. If you like the Red party, you can always affix blame to the Blues and not to yourself. If you're in the Blue party, you can lay all blame onto the Reds.

It's actually an elegant scam. The Blue v. Red show lets everyone avoid taking any blame onto themselves, while the big machine keeps right on running.

This fear of blame is ridiculous, of course: We've all made mistakes. What matters is correcting them and not repeating them. But if we pretend we never make mistakes, nothing gets fixed and the problems continue.

This neurotic avoidance of blame puts politicians in wonderful position - they don't actually have to solve anything, and any blame is deflected to their evil opposition.

Reason #2: It Makes Me Feel Brave at No Expense

Politics lets us pretend that we're fixing problems at no expense, save talking. Actually doing something is not required. Politics empowers our mere words to generate powerful results.

At least that's what people want to believe. It's the easy way out. You never have to get up and act. You never have to take a real risk. No blood, no sweat, no tears.

This is just another scam, of course: The politicians continue do what they want, and the people keep right on believing, even though their words seldom generate any real results.

All they need to do is keep you in the game. So long as you keep hoping that your words will affect the future, they can do whatever they please.

The alternative would be taking responsibility onto yourself and acting on your own. Gain would require pain... precisely the thing that people want to avoid.

So, instead, they keep believing that politics will magically turn complaints into results, and they remain tied into the system, no matter how badly it fails them.

Reason #3: It Makes Me Feel Noble at No Expense

Politics lets you pour charity onto the targets of your choice, without any personal expense. The magical money pot in the capital city dispenses it, and you feel no pain.

It doesn't matter what your target of choice is, by the way. For some, it's "the less fortunate," to others, it's people on another continent. It really doesn't matter, aside from the fact that it makes you feel good to help people and that you never have to put your hand into your own pocket.

Again, this is clearly a scam: The money comes from ourselves (in ways we don't think about), from others (those super-rich people), or, primarily these days, from generations yet unborn in the form of state debt.

But, those are things that can be ignored, and politicians are always quick to help us ignore them."

Paul Rosenberg

www.freemansperspective.com

More About "Onebornfree":

"Onebornfree" is a personal freedom consultant , a problem solver, and a musician. He can be reached at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom  .

Music Info: 

Onebornfree's [aka Fake-Eye D"] Music channel 

Home studio recording example "Somewhere Over The Rainbow Blues"[2014 Remix]:

             Youtube link 

Other 2014 "Studio" Remixes: "The Thrill Is Gone" , "Face In The Crowd Blues"

Live, solo example [own composition "Dreams [Anarchist's Blues]:

Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk

Onebornfree Personal Freedom Blogsites: 

                                                                                         

 Onebornfree's Financial Safety Services blog

Onebornfree's 9/11Research Review blog

Onebornfree's Freedom Network Mythbusters blog

The Freedom Network

The Problem-Solver