Attorney Jesse Trentadue talks to Lew Rockwell about the torture-murder of his brother, Kenneth, the Oklahoma City Bombing, and a highly suspicious sting operation.
Onebornfree's Commentary: I don't think that either Mr Trentadue or Mr Rockwell really "get it", although they could be just deliberately "shucking" I suppose.
As with both the Ruby Ridge incident, and the Waco Massacre, the ultimate goal of the 1995 "false flag" OKC bombing of the federal Murrah building was political- to directly benefit the Clinton administration by discrediting the looming threat of the "extreme right", in other words. [and it worked too.]
McVeigh apparently worked for the Federal government [former cell mate David Hammer has confirmed this] .
McVeigh's role was to directly discredit the burgeoning "Patriot Militia Movement" by appearing to be one of them and to therefor be deliberately seen to have been directly involved in the bombing.
According to the former cell mate the government had promised him immunity; that even if brought to trial and found guilty he would not be executed [ the execution would be faked] . As to whether or not his execution [by lethal injection] was ultimately faked, well its possible I suppose, however it seems to me that it would not make sense for the government to allow him to remain at large, as a "loose end" that might be able to cause political damage in the future. Regards, onebornfree
Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
New World Order Conspiracy Theorists Versus " Financial Illiteracy"
The Daily Bell: Financial Illiteracy of Those Who Mock Conspiracy Theorists
My only real problem with Mr Wile's otherwise excellent analysis :"Financial Illiteracy of Those Who Mock Conspiracy Theorists"
is his claim that the conspiracy towards installing one-world government is a conscious,deliberate policy by "the usual suspects".
Rather, for myself, it [i.e the move towards one-world government] is a completely natural, inevitable occurrence [given the realities of human action] once governments exist, and given the true nature of all governments, everywhere. Why would anyone really expect anything else?
Belief Implications
The belief that the move towards one-world government is part of an "elite's" conspiracy plan implies that without such an elite, there would be no move towards one-world government.
I find this to be a little naive, at best. Governments must grow in order to survive.
In as much as they will always constantly fail to achieve their stated social objectives, their growth [because if something fails, the only option is to pass more laws, and throw more money at any one problem] is an unchangeable given, even without those dreaded Illuminati and their new world order plans for all of us.
Personal Freedom Implications For the Concerned Individual
Given that either with, or without an elite, governments once created, will inevitably grow and consolidate as a "natural" survival instinct, what does this mean for the concerned, freedom-loving individual?
Personal Secession from the System?
As far as I can see, and without going into specific detail here [there would be no point], the only reasonable hope for that concerned individual is to completely eschew political solutions [i.e voting, protesting, agitating for new laws etc.] , and instead to use that newly freed up time, and start to seriously look for direct ways to circumvent, avoid, and otherwise go around "the system" in all its glorious forms, in whatever ways that appear suitable for that individuals own personal morality and belief system [whatever it might be].
Regards, onebornfree
[To discuss further, message me in the comment section here, or email : onebornfreeatyahoodotcom. Free phone conversations by "Skype" may also be possible. ]
My only real problem with Mr Wile's otherwise excellent analysis :"Financial Illiteracy of Those Who Mock Conspiracy Theorists"
is his claim that the conspiracy towards installing one-world government is a conscious,deliberate policy by "the usual suspects".
Rather, for myself, it [i.e the move towards one-world government] is a completely natural, inevitable occurrence [given the realities of human action] once governments exist, and given the true nature of all governments, everywhere. Why would anyone really expect anything else?
Belief Implications
The belief that the move towards one-world government is part of an "elite's" conspiracy plan implies that without such an elite, there would be no move towards one-world government.
I find this to be a little naive, at best. Governments must grow in order to survive.
In as much as they will always constantly fail to achieve their stated social objectives, their growth [because if something fails, the only option is to pass more laws, and throw more money at any one problem] is an unchangeable given, even without those dreaded Illuminati and their new world order plans for all of us.
Personal Freedom Implications For the Concerned Individual
Given that either with, or without an elite, governments once created, will inevitably grow and consolidate as a "natural" survival instinct, what does this mean for the concerned, freedom-loving individual?
Personal Secession from the System?
As far as I can see, and without going into specific detail here [there would be no point], the only reasonable hope for that concerned individual is to completely eschew political solutions [i.e voting, protesting, agitating for new laws etc.] , and instead to use that newly freed up time, and start to seriously look for direct ways to circumvent, avoid, and otherwise go around "the system" in all its glorious forms, in whatever ways that appear suitable for that individuals own personal morality and belief system [whatever it might be].
Regards, onebornfree
[To discuss further, message me in the comment section here, or email : onebornfreeatyahoodotcom. Free phone conversations by "Skype" may also be possible. ]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)