obf disclaimer: links to any authors articles or videos are not necessarily full endorsements of all of the views/positions of any of the individuals or organizations concerned!
Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email: onebornfree at yahoo dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
“If, as it seems we are, in the process of becoming a totalitarian society in which the state apparatus is all-powerful, the ethics most important for the survival of the true, free, human individual would be: cheat, lie, evade, fake it, be elsewhere, forge documents, build improved electronic gadgets in your garage that’ll outwit the gadgets used by the authorities.” Philip K. Dick
More of My Favorite Quotes [Misc.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bill Gates/Vaccine/World Depopulation Scam
James Corbett looks at the real Bill Gates, as opposed to his well crafted public persona.
Collectivisms "Us/We/Americans"Scam
[obf sez: collectivism [i.e. socialism, fascism, communism etc.] all depend on the false assumption, or lie, of the big "we".]"There is no such thing as "group" human action, such as Americans chose to sell stock last week, Frenchmen like to go to the Riviera...."
-----------------------------------
Ad: More Freedom 4U?:The Problem Solver- Onebornfree's Personal Freedom Consulting
------------------------------------
The Constitution Scam
"We are born with rights and we die with rights, whether any piece of paper exists or not. If rights are claimed to exist because of a constitution , no rights exist at all. The tyranny we face today is because of the Constitution, not in spite of it." [See also my own "The Bill of Rights Scam - [aka The 1789 Judiciary Act Scam]"
------------------------------------
Another Global Pandemic Coming? Bank Failures Coming?, Stock Market Crash Coming?, Deflation Coming?,Inflation Coming? What's Next? Are you worried about your savings/investments? See: How To Safely Profit In Stocks,Gold,Crypto's etc., Despite An Unknowable Economic Future
-----------------------------------
Website recommendation. The Free Thought Project website is probably the most consistently anti-cop site I've ever seen. The videos of cop abuse nationwide posted there are so sickening and anger-inducing that its hard to view, even for myself, a long time cynic whose opinion of human behavior is already pretty low. So don't go there if you have a frail constitution.
Podcast: Onebornfree's Radio Interview On The Fabulous Fakeologist Radio Show [Show no. FAK 224]Saturday April 4th. 2020
The 9/11 Scam-The Faked "Live" MSM Imagery
Revealed! The computer-manufactured fraudulence all of the mainstream media’s original“live” footage broadcast on the morning of Sept.11th 2001.
***************************
My Music:My composition “Dreams [Matrix Blues]”performed solo,live at open mike.[YouTube]
In case you missed the blatant advertising above, "Onebornfree" is also an Investment Philosophy Consultant,and, a Personal Freedom and Natural Health Consultant
obf disclaimer: links to any authors articles or videos are not necessarily full endorsements of all of the views/positions of any of the individuals or organizations concerned!
Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email: onebornfree at yahoo dot com
Showing posts with label Judiciary Act 1789 Scam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judiciary Act 1789 Scam. Show all posts
Sunday, May 3, 2020
Monday, May 17, 2010
The Bill of Rights Scam - [aka The 1789 Judiciary Act Scam]
Many freedom seekers suffer under the illusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are not, and never were, open to free interpretation by the Federal judiciary and its Supreme Court, and thus waste much valuable time and resources fighting the system "for their rights" etc. [See also my previous blog "You've Never Had Any Rights: Three Good Reasons Why The US Constitution and Bill of Rights are Not Worth the Paper They Were Written On" ]
The article linked to here["1789" by Jim Davies] shows how wrong they are and explains how the Bill of Rights, which , by itself would have effectively limited the scope of the federal courts entirely to the two crimes listed in the constitution itself, [piracy and treason],leaving all other criminal prosecutions to individual states, was effectively gotten around [i.e subverted] by the exact same persons who drafted the Bill of Rights.
Important Chronology
The Judiciary Act of 1789 was signed into law on Sept.24th. 1789, while the Bill of Rights did not leave congress until the next day,Sept 25th 1789.
Keep in mind that the same people who passed the Judiciary Act into immediate law of the land status, were, at the exact same time busy putting the final touches on a document [the Bill of Rights] which they knew had to be ratified by the individual states before it ever [if ever!]became law . That ratification of the Bill of Rights took almost 2 years.
That means that for almost two years before the Bill of Rights ever went into effect, a Federal law was in operation that already, pre-emptively, granted "supreme" power to the Supreme court to ultimately decide what both it and the constitution actually "meant". [ And who decides who sits on the Supreme court?].
Also,bear in mind that the Judiciary Act accomplished the exact opposite of the intent of the Bill of Rights,most of which was concerned with placing severe limitations on the jurisdiction of federal courts and the evidentiary procedures that could be used to prosecute the only two constitutionally specified federal crimes - treason and piracy.
Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granted overriding power to the Supreme Court to ultimately"interpret" the Constitution and Bill of Rights, deciding what they meant on a case by case basis, effectively filling in the huge gaps in Article 3 of the Constitution itself, where , despite what most today imagine, no overriding,specific authority for the Federal judiciary to decide/interpret the "law of the land" was ever actually granted {except in cases of piracy or treason}
You have to hand it to them- one hell of an "end run" around the supposed "constitutional limits" and the far more restrictive language of the Bill of Rights!
- Regards, onebornfree.
Link to article by JimDavies: "1789"
The article linked to here["1789" by Jim Davies] shows how wrong they are and explains how the Bill of Rights, which , by itself would have effectively limited the scope of the federal courts entirely to the two crimes listed in the constitution itself, [piracy and treason],leaving all other criminal prosecutions to individual states, was effectively gotten around [i.e subverted] by the exact same persons who drafted the Bill of Rights.
Important Chronology
The Judiciary Act of 1789 was signed into law on Sept.24th. 1789, while the Bill of Rights did not leave congress until the next day,Sept 25th 1789.
Keep in mind that the same people who passed the Judiciary Act into immediate law of the land status, were, at the exact same time busy putting the final touches on a document [the Bill of Rights] which they knew had to be ratified by the individual states before it ever [if ever!]became law . That ratification of the Bill of Rights took almost 2 years.
That means that for almost two years before the Bill of Rights ever went into effect, a Federal law was in operation that already, pre-emptively, granted "supreme" power to the Supreme court to ultimately decide what both it and the constitution actually "meant". [ And who decides who sits on the Supreme court?].
Also,bear in mind that the Judiciary Act accomplished the exact opposite of the intent of the Bill of Rights,most of which was concerned with placing severe limitations on the jurisdiction of federal courts and the evidentiary procedures that could be used to prosecute the only two constitutionally specified federal crimes - treason and piracy.
Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granted overriding power to the Supreme Court to ultimately"interpret" the Constitution and Bill of Rights, deciding what they meant on a case by case basis, effectively filling in the huge gaps in Article 3 of the Constitution itself, where , despite what most today imagine, no overriding,specific authority for the Federal judiciary to decide/interpret the "law of the land" was ever actually granted {except in cases of piracy or treason}
You have to hand it to them- one hell of an "end run" around the supposed "constitutional limits" and the far more restrictive language of the Bill of Rights!
- Regards, onebornfree.
Link to article by JimDavies: "1789"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)