Showing posts with label why government doesn't work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label why government doesn't work. Show all posts

Sunday, September 9, 2018

The World's Biggest, Most Dangerous Scam Is........

The "Government Solutions Work" Scam:

 The most dangerous assumption in the world today, as I see it, is the widely held, rarely questioned assumption that says " There's a Government Solution To This Problem" [whatever the problem is].

The World's Best Kept Secret

The plain fact is, nothing could be further from the truth - in fact, that assumption is the exact opposite of the truth. That in reality, government "solutions" don't work, never have worked, and  cannot work, ever, is one of the world's best kept secrets, as far as I can see.

Ignoring All Evidence

Nevertheless, today, as with previous generations worldwide, despite massive amounts of "in yer face" evidence to the contrary, most  otherwise "intelligent" people  continue to  persist in blithely and naively believing in the fantasy that, against all odds, the very next proposed wonderful government "solution", whether from "the left", the "far left", "the right", or the "alt-right", will somehow work; that there is, in fact, a brilliant, government -made, "Solution To The Problem", whatever that problem might actually be.

My "Special Scam Alerts" Primary Focus

The primary goal/focus  of  my " Special Scam Alerts" has always been to expose the bald faced lie that there are government solutions that work, to any perceived social "problem".

In fact, my very own first quote, at the top of each regular "Special Scam Alert" blog entry,  clearly lays out the true nature, and therefor the underlying reason, as to exactly why government "solutions" can never work in the future, and never have in the past.

And if you don't care for my long-winded, self-penned quote, see the quote of the far more esteemed, learned and literate Albert J. Nock below mine, or read the excerpt below from the most important and radical book on politics and political philosophy in recent history, if not ever, in my opinion: "Why Government Doesn't Work" by the late, great Harry Browne.

The only thing Harry got wrong, in my opinion , was the title. Instead of being called "Why Government Doesn't Work", he should have called it "Why Government Cannot Work" :-) :



                                                                             The late, great Harry Browne [1933-2006]
                                                      
".......Government doesn’t work. You work, I work, Federal Express works,
Microsoft works, the Salvation Army works, Alcoholics Anonymous works, but
government doesn’t.

Changing our Perspective

Once we realize that government doesn’t work, we will stop asking what
government should do, and notice instead that government can’t do the things
we want:

 We may want government regulation to protect us from fraud, but the truth is that government doesn’t protect us from fraud.

The savings and loan crisis, every class-action law suit, and every financial scandal are testaments to the government’s inability to shield us from fraud or incompetence.

We may think crime control is a proper function of government, but the truth is that government doesn’t control crime. Our cities are war zones. At most, the government promises only to look for the person who robs, rapes, or murders you.

 We may like to think that government sets the rules of the marketplace and acts as the referee, but in reality the government’s rules are arbitrary, ambiguous, and constantly changing. And the “referee” always seems to side with the team with the greatest political influence.

Once we realize that government doesn’t work, we will stop dreaming that this or that social problem can be solved by passing a law — or by creating anew government program — or by electing someone who will make Washington
more efficient or cost-conscious.

Once we realize that government doesn’t work, we’ll know that the only way to improve government is by reducing its size — by doing away with laws, by getting rid of programs, by making government spend and tax less, by reducing government as far as we can.

And once we realize that government doesn’t work, we will know which side of any political issue to cheer for: If the proposal would increase the size, the reach, or the importance of government, it would be a mistake to support it — no matter how honorable its stated purpose. If the proposal would reduce the
size, the reach, or the importance of government, it would be an improvement — no matter what its flaws — because it can’t be worse than what it will replace........":

Excerpted from Harry Browne's : Why Government Doesn't Work

Related articles: "You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs "Dictator Syndrome""

"The Immigration Scam"                                   Politics Is Poison

Regards, onebornfree


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6uVV2Dcqt0

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email:  onebornfree at yahoo dot com

Friday, August 28, 2015

You,Trump,Sanders Etc., Vs "Dictator Syndrome"

     
                         


[Who is "?" above?Insert  any image you choose- Obama, Bush 1 or 2, Clinton, Reagan,Kennedy, Washington, Jefferson, Adams or your own, perhaps ?]


[Obf sez: as a personal freedom consultant and problem solver , one of the biggest and most dangerous belief hurdles/barriers that I frequently come across when talking with both clients, and others, and one that I believe that any truly freedom-seeking individual has to eventually see through, {or somehow jump over}, is the individuals almost unshakeable belief/assumptions for the necessity of, and the integrity of , the institution known as government.

In truth, their greatest enemy is, in fact, the government under which they live , as is/are the multitudes of paid for intellectual mouthpieces/sycophants who serve as its constant cheerleader within the almost entirely goverment-controlled and licensed media outlets of every type, everywhere.

Which brings me to the hilarious spectacle of the current 2016 US presidential election cycle.

A major psychological reason as to why individuals actually believe in any of the current crop of US presidential wannabe's, and indeed, the entire political process, year after year, after year, is something that the great Harry Browne has called "The Dictator Syndrome" , which basically boils down to a series of false assumptions about the way governments actually work in the real world.

The sad fact is that each and every one of the candidates for the US presidency suffer from this syndrome, as do all of their millions and millions of supporters/believers/sycophants.

I'll let Harry explain it, below.

N.B. If you do not understand or believe his short, clear summary of how the real-world political process actually works as laid out below, perhaps we need to talk, for, make no mistake, this is a very important issue- you can never hope to be truly free until you remove this particularly delusional and self-damaging belief from your personal belief system. I can be reached at : onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

Regards, onebornfree]

Harry Browne: "If You Were King (The Dictator Syndrome)"

"Government grows also because well-meaning people like you and me believe it should do certain things that seem beyond controversy -- find a cure for cancer, stop air pollution, keep violence off television, hold back an aggressor in the Middle East -- something that everyone seems to agree should be done. Whatever the goal, it's easy to imagine that a single-minded government could achieve it.

I call this The Dictator Syndrome. You see suffering or danger, and in your imagination you see a government program eliminating it. But in the real world the program would operate as you expect only if you were an absolute dictator -- having at your disposal all of government's power to compel everyone to do things your way."

Running the Gauntlet of Political Action

"Just for a moment, think about something you wish the government would do and that nearly everyone would like to see happen -- provide swifter and surer punishment for criminals, teach children right and wrong, furnish health care to those who don't have it, bring peace to Bosnia, or whatever. Imagine a goal so important that it seems to justify using government's power to coerce.

And now, consider what will actually happen to your program.

To get it enacted you'll need political allies, since alone you have only limited influence. But other people will support your plan and work for it only if you modify it in dozens of ways that further their goals and satisfy their opinions.

Suppose you make the necessary compromises and amass enough support to pressure the politicians to vote for your revised program. Who will write the actual law? You? Of course not. It will be written by the same legislators and aides who created all the laws, programs, and problems you object to now. Each of them will compromise your program still further to satisfy his political supporters.

And if the law passes, who will administer it? You? Of course not. It will be implemented by bureaucrats -- many of whom will use it to pursue goals quite different from what you had in mind. They won't care what your purpose was. It's their law now, and they'll use it to suit their objectives.

And, lastly, the new law probably will generate many disputes -- cases that must be settled in a courtroom. Who will decide those cases? You? Of course not. It will be the same judges who today rule according to their own beliefs, rather than by reference to the written law. A judge may even rule that your law means exactly the opposite of what you had intended.
By the time your program has run this gauntlet, it will be far bigger and far more expensive (in money and disrupted lives) than you had imagined. And it will have been twisted to satisfy many factions. In fact, your program may end up being the opposite of what you had intended.

In any case, you will have provided a new tool by which others can use government for their own ends."

Excerpted form: Browne, Harry, Why Government Doesn't Work, Chapter 5, "If You Were King (The Dictator Syndrome), St, Martin's Press, New York, NY, 1995, pp 20-21


Regards, onebornfree.

Related articles :

 "The Fiscal Fantasies of Stephen Zarlenga and Other Monetary Reformers"