Saturday, July 19, 2008

9/11- No Planes Hit WTC 1& 2, or The Pentagon, and Most Likely, Explosives Did Not Bring Down the Towers

9/11- No Planes Hit WTC 1& 2, or The Pentagon, and Most Likely, Explosives Did Not Bring Down the Towers

No Planes?

Since around 2002 I've known that no plastic nosed, aluminum skin plane is capable of hitting the Pentagon and puncturing a series of holes through 3-5 concentric rings of concrete, each ring with 5 feet thick reinforced concrete walls - or how ever many rings and walls it is claimed were penetrated by said plane.

Since early 2007, based on review of the photographic evidence of the post event damage, I've known that explosives detonations such as thermite or thermate in no way explain the many highly unusual types of post collapse damage on record, and are no more than a convenient explanation for those unwilling to try to investigate and account for this unusual damage to the buildings themselves, and cars, trucks, etc. in the vicinity.

And around three months ago, after a lot of photo examination and thought, I've reached , I suppose ,the inevitable conclusion that no planes hit the WTC 1+2 buildings either.

Planes Through Buildings- Scientifically Impossible

Briefly, no planes hit the 2 towers, It is scientifically impossible for a plastic nose plane with a thin aluminum skin, traveling at a maximum possible speed of 250mph**, to literally cut through a 500.000 ton building made of reinforced concrete and steel to the point that the whole plane disappears inside the building in one piece, without parts[ e.g. engine, wings, tail], falling off at the moment of impact and then falling to the ground directly below the so-called entry hole.

** [half the speed given in the official US govmt. 911 report, by the way- 747's and similar can only fly at 550mph at 35,000 feet, where the air is much thinner, at 600 ft, the wings would be blown off by the air pressure at anything above around 250mph.
See:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY
], ]

Fake Videos

The famous video of the whole plane [flight 175] hitting WTC 2 and disappearing inside the building in one piece is therefor a fake. [ It was never aired live, contrary to what you might think, but came on the air at least 7 minutes after the supposed 2nd. strike].

This also means that the famous Naudet brothers video, which was not aired until the 12th Sept. is also a fake, as it to shows an entire plane [or more accurately, a "plane like object"] disappearing in one piece inside WTC1.

Fake Plane Entry Holes

Judging by the damage to the remaining girders within the 2 "entry" holes circumferences [e.g. steel girders cut straight through, girders bent outwards, lack of plane parts etc.], explosives were probably used to make the fake "plane- entry" holes in both WTC1 & 2.


Towers Brought Down With Direct Energy Weapons[DEW]?

Based on the evidence available [ collapse time, top to bottom collapse sequence, and most importantly ,post collapse damage to remaining building parts, damage to surrounding ground , damage to automobiles etc.], what probably brought the 2 main WTC buildings down was something called "Direct Energy Weapons" [DEW], which can reduce both concrete and steel to dust.

These types of weapons leave a very definite signature when used, a signature which is found time and time again within the debris of the WTC and surrounding area.

The unusual types of damage are simply not consistent with the use of explosives as far as I'm aware.

Links:

No planes : http://nomoregames.net/

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/

Fake Plane Videos: http://911logic.blogspot.com/

Video "September Clues" part 1: http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice/

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=163&Itemid=60

Direct Energy Weapons : http://drjudywood.com/

[Types of] Damage Anomalies at the WTC: http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

6 comments:

  1. (Private message.)
    Thanks for the great post. And thanks for thinking logically! Let's hope it's contagious.

    You may like the new charts posted early this morning:

    http://drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html#mag1

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for linking to DrJudyWood and ChecktheEvidence.

    I think this is the most important information in the world for people to consider.

    I would urge them to study Dr Wood's newer series here:

    http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm with you on just recently switching to a no planes opinion.

    However, the energy beam part is really unimportant since we already know that no matter what, part of the US Govt was involved. True or not true, the story remains the same as to the culprits .

    But what is earthshattering is if there were coordinated fake computer graphics on CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, and NBC. That blows 911 into a whole new league!!

    If that part is true, then our national media has become a pys-op arm of big-brother!

    So I think we can drop worrying about the energy beams part - let's focus on the Computer Graphics part. I'm still in a state of shock about the no planes (I've been "shocked" so many times - this is getting old!).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anon said:"But what is earthshattering is if there were coordinated fake computer graphics on CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, and NBC. That blows 911 into a whole new league!!

    If that part is true, then our national media has become a pys-op arm of big-brother!

    So I think we can drop worrying about the energy beams part - let's focus on the Computer Graphics part. "

    I understand your shock, but when you get over it a few months from now I would suggest that you reconsider the energy beams theory, if only as a comparative exercise in the use and misuse of scientific method.

    In your last paragraph you use the collective "we". I would urge you to stop thinking "we[as in what "we all" "need" to "do"[, and start thinking as an individual.

    To free yourself you must stop thinking that a "we" can change the world to "our way" of thinking, and stop trying to free the world- let it and the people in it take care of itself/themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Onebornfree - thanks for your posts on PrisonPlanet. It may take a while, but they will eventually wake up.

    ReplyDelete
  6. CB_Brooklyn said...

    Onebornfree - thanks for your posts on PrisonPlanet. It may take a while, but they will eventually wake up.

    Personally,I'm not waiting for anyone to wake up, and I would humbly suggest, neither should you.

    I teach personal secession, not world-changing, and so the only person who has to wake up is yourself, it is not necessary to change anybody else's mind before you can be free.

    ReplyDelete