Complete Fetzer/onebornfree radio interview 09/05/12[MP3 file]
Interview Section 4.
1]The Richard Hall Video Analysis and My Questions For Dr. Fetzer, Continued
2] Fake Network Fl. 175 Footage with contradictory flight paths.
3]Fake WTC1, 2 and 7 Collapse Footage + New Fake N.I.S.T. Collapse Footage.
4] Fake "live" Amateur Footage [Herzekhani video] :
Q:If a Hologram Was Used, Why Not Two Plane Images In at Least Some Aired Footage? :
if the hologram theory is correct, would we not expect to see TWO plane images [1400ft. apart] in at least one of the wide-view MSM video sequences [e.g the CBS, NBC, and FOX 5 wide shot]? Or is there something I am misunderstanding about Mr Fetzer/Mr. Hall's theory perhaps? [update/correction 11/11/12: on a subsequent listening I learn that Mr Hall believes that the plane projecting the holographic plane image was invisible via S.T.E.A.L.T.H. technology or similar. ]
What's more, none of the original MSM broadcast approach sequences for Fl.175 [e.g. CBS NBC, ABC, FOX, etc.] show matching flight paths, the most glaring differences are between original CBS "divebomber" live sequence and all the rest, but even with the CBS footage excluded, the others still do not match each other, nor do they match all of the subsequently released alleged "amateur" footage either, which even if taken as a group by themselves [i.e. all "amateur" only], fail to match each other! [ The question being: if holograms were used and were caught live on camera by the networks and amateurs, why are there such obvious, glaring discrepancies in the flight paths of Fl.175 in the various original "live" video records?].
Recently the super observant folks at September Clues uncovered yet more evidence in support of this proposition:
My Final Point to Dr Fetzer : The Total Fakery of the Herzekhani video sequence that he takes as being genuine and has used as part of the evidence to support his holographic plane theory :
N.B. There are many other internal problems with the Herzekhani sequence- I only had enough time in my interview to briefly address the one issue. Hopefully if I am invited back I will have a chance to address other problems with it as revealed by various researchers over the years, as well as to possibly address similar problems with the Evan Fairbanks "live" video sequence.
Don't forget, that outside of Newton's 3rd. Law of Motion [assumption number 1 for Dr Fetzer] the Herzekhani and Fairbanks make up his second and third assumptions, and that those three assumptions together are the primary reasons for his conclusion to date that holograms of a plane image were employed on 9/11.