2]Richard Hall's Hologram Theory Video Analysis.
3] Strange Change of Shape of Entry Hole in WTC1, Post Impact.
Dr Fetzer "Truth and Shadows" quote [September 2, 2012 – 9:56 am ] :
[ I agree with Dr. Fetzer regarding this assumption] .
Dr Fetzer Assumption : that the Evan Fairbanks "amateur" video, like the Herzekhani footage, is also genuine and likewise depicts a holographic plane image entering a real tower image, in other words, it is a genuine video capture of a real time, real world, event.
[I respectfully, but strongly, disagree with the use of unverifiable, entirely verbal "eyewitness" testimony as a legitimate part of a scientific methodology- as you will hear, Dr. Fetzer does not share my "unschooled" opinion on this matter. ]
The Strange Case of the More Believable British Accent
Furthermore, as "Ab Irato" says in his August 14, 2012 4:43 AM comment concerning the unsubstantiated Forbes claims:
Dr. Fetzer Assumption 5 ? : The Richard Hall Video Analysis:
Further "confirmation" [i.e. mental reinforcement] for Dr Fetzer's hologram theory [ i.e. of what he already "knows"] appears to be the newer Richard Hall video [ released 04/12] : Complete Richard Hall hologram video
This "confirmation" could well be called "working assumption no.5" for Dr Fetzer.
Here are two issues I attempted to raise during my radio interview:
The Importance of The CBS "Live" Fl.175 Footage:
For those of you who do not understand the importance of the original "live" CBS "divebomber" sequence, if you had been watching CBS network TV on the morning of 9/11, as a CBS viewer you would have been the first to see the plane image come into view pre-strike. The CBS "live" sequence was the longest aired [a full 16 secs. pre-strike] of any of the original network footage. [The next longest is the NBC sequence, at 14 secs.] As an archived verifiable visual record, the CBS footage is important for that fact alone [its length], let alone for the obvious fact that the flight path it shows for Fl.175 is unlike that seen in any other network, or "amateur", "live" footage, and even strongly implies a completely different angle of strike/penetration compared to what is seen in other footage [right wing ahead of left- whereas most other footage shows a straight on collision, or has the left wing slightly ahead of the right when striking.]
Significantly perhaps, Mr. Hall's analysis makes no attempt to differentiate between original "live" network footage as archived,
and the 45 odd, subsequently released alleged "amateur" video releases of the same event, but mixes all sources together for this analysis.
[Click on image to enlarge]
Here is a link to Simon Shack's analysis of the strange change of the entry hole configuration allegedly made by Fl. 11 into the North tower [start at around 2:35 into video ]